• Latest
  • Trending
  • All

Ford to license battery tech from China’s CATL for $3.5bn factory

February 13, 2023

Why the UK should inject some fizz into carbon capture

March 24, 2023

Copper price to surge to record high this year, Trafigura forecasts

March 24, 2023

Ohio bill would require teaching ‘both sides’ on climate

March 24, 2023

EU seeks to tone down the imperial style in search for critical minerals

March 23, 2023

Wind farm repowering should be data-driven

March 23, 2023

Hungary in talks with France over role in Russian-led nuclear plant

March 23, 2023

Hydropower technology development is encouraged, but implementation is challenged – Why?

March 23, 2023

Ferrexpo: cash generation offers hope that group can weather the war

March 23, 2023

Why are women less likely to buy electric vehicles than men?

March 23, 2023

We should regulate SUVs out of existence

March 23, 2023

Minn. startup uses plants to trap CO2 emissions

March 23, 2023

Fears of an energy price surge percolate through sector

March 23, 2023
Markets by TradingView
Energy Trends
  • Home
  • News
  • Policy
  • Renewable
  • Companies
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • More
    • Climate
    • Infrastructure
No Result
View All Result
Energy Trends
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Policy
  • Companies
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Climate
  • Infrastructure
  • Renewable
Home Companies

Ford to license battery tech from China’s CATL for $3.5bn factory

February 13, 2023
in Companies
242 10
A A
0
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Ford plans to license technology from Chinese battery group CATL to use in a $3.5bn factory it plans to build in Michigan as it accelerates a push into electric vehicles.

The carmaker’s deal with the world’s biggest battery producer comes as new US tax credits for EVs take effect under the Inflation Reduction Act climate law that passed last year.

However, the law prevents cars containing components from a “foreign entity of concern” — a reference to China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — from receiving these tax credits.

The licensing agreement with CATL differs from other recent deals struck between car companies and battery-makers, in which General Motors, Stellantis and Ford have formed joint ventures with manufacturers LG, SK and Samsung, all of which are headquartered in South Korea.

“There’s a good probability that it probably would not have been a joint venture if it wasn’t a Chinese company,” said Sam Abuelsamid, an analyst at Guidehouse Insights, said of Ford’s announcement. “It’s likely CATL and Ford looked at the political landscape and decided this was the best solution to minimise any political blowback.”

The plant will be wholly owned by a Ford subsidiary and employ 2,500 workers when it opens in three years, executives said. The Michigan-based carmaker will pay to use CATL’s formula to make lithium iron phosphate batteries, a chemistry that is cheaper but less energy-dense than today’s EV batteries containing nickel, cobalt and manganese.

“A more affordable battery will drive higher EV adoption,” said Marin Gjaja, Ford’s chief customer officer.

Ford and CATL agreed last year that the Mustang Mach-E vehicle would begin using CATL batteries this year, followed by the F-150 Lightning truck in 2024. The new lithium iron phosphate batteries will be available for both models.

Lisa Drake, vice-president of EV industrialisation at Ford, said that the company had considered the possibility that China’s government might bar the licensing of technology outside the country, and has built contingencies into the contract with CATL. CATL employees will help the plant start operations, and some of the equipment will come from China.

Ford expects that consumers who buy EVs with these batteries initially would qualify for half of the $7,500 tax credit available for consumer vehicle purchases, Gjaja said, though the sum could rise to the full amount over time based on where the carmaker procures minerals. Ford has lobbied the US government since autumn to clarify rules about to what degree EVs can include battery components manufactured by “a foreign entity of concern”.

The manufacturer considered sites in Canada and Mexico but chose to set up the plant in southwestern Michigan because of provisions in the IRA that encourage US manufacturing.

“The IRA was incredibly important to us, and frankly, it did what it was intended to do,” Drake said.

Related Articles

Companies

Copper price to surge to record high this year, Trafigura forecasts

March 24, 2023
Companies

EU seeks to tone down the imperial style in search for critical minerals

March 23, 2023
Companies

Hungary in talks with France over role in Russian-led nuclear plant

March 23, 2023
Companies

Ferrexpo: cash generation offers hope that group can weather the war

March 23, 2023
Companies

Fears of an energy price surge percolate through sector

March 23, 2023
Companies

Germany risks running out of gas next winter, regulator warns

March 23, 2023
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Scale Microgrid Solutions steps into community solar development

March 15, 2023

Inside America’s energy revolution

February 16, 2023

DOE funds concentrated solar thermal project for cement production

February 16, 2023

Carbon credit groups seek to expand investor appeal

0

Carbon counter: linear TV repeats are greener than buzzy Netflix premieres

0

Scientists advance novel perovskite solar cell process

0

Why the UK should inject some fizz into carbon capture

March 24, 2023

Copper price to surge to record high this year, Trafigura forecasts

March 24, 2023

Ohio bill would require teaching ‘both sides’ on climate

March 24, 2023

Latest News

Why the UK should inject some fizz into carbon capture

March 24, 2023

Ohio bill would require teaching ‘both sides’ on climate

March 24, 2023

Wind farm repowering should be data-driven

March 23, 2023

Hydropower technology development is encouraged, but implementation is challenged – Why?

March 23, 2023

Why are women less likely to buy electric vehicles than men?

March 23, 2023

We should regulate SUVs out of existence

March 23, 2023
Energy Trends

Copyright © 2022 Energy Trends. All rights Reserved.

Navigate Site

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Contact
  • Advertise

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Policy
  • Companies
  • Markets
  • Tech
  • Climate
  • Infrastructure
  • Renewable

Copyright © 2022 Energy Trends. All rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In